
BLOG
BLOG
Choosing the wrong AST (Application Security Testing) platform doesn't just waste your budget. It leads to:
In its latest research, “How to Avoid Common Pitfalls in Selecting Application Security Testing Tools,” Gartner highlights the five most common mistakes security leaders make when evaluating AST platforms.
In this blog, we break down Gartner’s key insights and share what teams should look for when choosing a tool that works in the real world.
Focusing only on false positives during a demo is like test-driving a car based on the cupholders.
Gartner warns that organizations often prioritize scan accuracy during PoCs but neglect developer experience, integration ease, and remediation speed, which ultimately drive success or failure.
Tool sprawl is the silent killer of AppSec velocity.
Teams that adopt separate tools for SAST, DAST, API testing, and runtime checks often face integration gaps, overlapping alerts, and delayed remediation.
It’s easy to overlook where your AppSec tool will run until legal and compliance teams step in.
Especially in regulated sectors or international rollouts, cloud-only models may not be enough.
Vendors offering:
Security tools aren’t just a transaction; they’re a relationship.
Gartner stresses the importance of evaluating vendor responsiveness, roadmap alignment, and customer success capabilities, all of which matter more after the deal is signed.
The best AppSec tools make developers part of the solution, not the problem.
Tools that don’t align with dev workflows will be ignored, bypassed, or resisted. Gartner recommends prioritizing usability, fast feedback, and non-blocking remediation flows.
Tools that offer:
Pitfall |
What to look for instead |
Obsessing over accuracy |
Real-world remediation support & integrations |
Buying multiple tools |
Unified AppSec platform (SAST + DAST + API + mobile) |
Cloud-only deployment |
Flexible, on-prem, or hybrid deployment |
One-time onboarding |
Continuous support, roadmap alignment |
Ignoring developer needs |
Dev-friendly UX + CI/CD-native + contextual fixes |
AppSec tools fail for one of two reasons: either the team can't scale them, or the developers won’t use them.
Gartner’s report is a reminder to choose a tool that sits right with the reality of your team, with your people, your process, and your compliance needs, not just what shines in the demo.
If you are evaluating AST platforms today, these five checkpoints could save you time, money, and post-purchase regret.
Appknox is proud to be recognized by Gartner in this year’s AST report, not because we checked a box, but because we’ve built a solution designed for the reality of modern security teams.
Category |
Appknox capability |
Mobile-first testing |
Yes (iOS + Android, binary-based) |
Unified platform |
SAST, DAST, API, App store monitoring, Privacy testing, SBOM |
Deployment options |
Cloud, private cloud, On-prem |
CI/CD support |
GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Bitbucket, Azure |
Developer experience |
Jira-native, IDE-friendly, fast feedback |
Post-sale support |
Dedicated engineer, onboarding playbooks |
Want to see what a developer-friendly, mobile-first AppSec platform really looks like?
Gartner attribution
Gartner, “How to Avoid Common Pitfalls in Selecting Application Security Testing Tools,” Dale Gardner, 10 July 2025. GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is used herein with permission. All rights reserved.