BLOG
BLOG
KnoxIQ is the agentic triage layer in Appknox. It takes the findings from your SAST and DAST scans, filters out the ones that aren't real and ranks the rest by how exploitable they are in your build. For each one, it shows you how to reproduce it and writes a fix for your app, including a prompt for Claude Code, Cursor, Github Copilot or any AI coding agent.
Ask any Security expert, finding issues was never the hard part. The hard part starts when the report lands. Someone has to decide which findings are real, which ones an attacker could actually use and how a developer should fix them. On most teams, that someone is a senior security engineer, working through the list by hand.
But now, KnoxIQ does that triage, it validates every finding, scores its exploitability, writes steps to reproduce it and hands your developers a fix for your app. You still decide what ships. You just stop spending your week working out where to start.
A scan produces findings. Turning them into fixes is manual work, and it breaks down in four places.
Noise. A single scan can return hundreds of findings. One vulnerability type can have many instances: every hardcoded string, every sensitive log statement, every unobfuscated class. Most AppSec teams cover web and API too, so the same five or ten people get a long list from every tool.
Manual triage doesn't scale. Confirming a finding means reproducing it: decompile the APK or IPA, find the class or manifest entry, check whether the pattern is reachable. Multiply that by every finding and every release, and your most expensive people spend their week on repetitive work.
Severity without exploitability. CVSS tells you how bad an issue could be. It doesn't tell you whether an attacker can exploit it in your build. So teams sort by severity, spend sprints on high-severity findings that carry little real risk and leave an exploitable medium waiting.
Low-context handoffs. Developers get a finding with a description, a CWE ID and a generic compliant code sample. They still have to work out where the issue lives in their app and what a safe change looks like. Fixes slow down, and the back-and-forth wears on both teams.
AI coding agents have widened the gap. Teams that shipped quarterly now ship weekly, and some ship daily. Ten releases a week can mean ten assessments and a thousand findings, all landing on the same security team. Code volume has scaled. Security headcount hasn't.
We built KnoxIQ to do the triage work security engineers do by hand today: decide what's real, what's exploitable and how to fix it.
KnoxIQ sits on top of the Appknox scanner, and detection doesn't change. Appknox still tests your binary with the same deterministic SAST and DAST engines, so the same build gives the same findings every time. When a scan finishes, KnoxIQ picks up its findings and runs them through a set of AI agents, each with one narrow job.
That's what we mean by agentic, it isn't a chatbot beside your results or a summary on top of a report. It does the triage.
Today, KnoxIQ covers SAST and DAST findings for Android and iOS apps. API findings are next.
Every finding goes through four steps, each handled by its own agent.
If your developers work with an AI coding agent, Appknox MCP takes the last step further. The agent pulls the KnoxIQ fix plan straight into the editor, applies the change in your repo and verifies it with an Appknox re-scan.
AEIS sits beside CVSS v4 on every finding. It doesn't replace it. CVSS answers "how bad could this be?" AEIS answers "can an attacker actually use it here?"
It's built from factors AppSec teams already know. For each finding, the exploit agent sets every factor to true, false or unknown, using a mix of fixed rules and AI reasoning.
|
Factor |
What it asks |
|
Requires chaining |
Can the flaw be exploited on its own, or only combined with another flaw? |
|
Remote exploitation |
Can an attacker exploit it over the network, or only with the device in hand? |
|
Public exploit exists |
Is there a known, published way to exploit it? |
|
Local exploitation only |
Is the attack limited to someone with local access to the device? |
|
User interaction |
Does the attack need the victim to do something? |
|
No authentication required |
Can it be exploited without logging in? |
|
Obscure or environment-specific |
Does it only work under unusual conditions? |
The score runs from 1 to 10 and maps to high, medium or low exploitability. When the evidence doesn't settle a factor, the agent marks it unknown. It doesn't guess.
Two findings from our internal demo show how KnoxIQ changes the order of work.
A medium that jumped the queue. Appknox flagged a StrandHogg task-hijacking issue in a sample Android app. On severity alone, it's a medium. KnoxIQ rated it highly exploitable. The validated finding traced it to an exported main activity combined with a PendingIntent that launches an activity with FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK. That combination lets a malicious app inject a fake screen into the legitimate app's task stack. The fix plan pointed to AndroidManifest.xml and the exact change needed to secure the exported MainActivity. Sorted by CVSS, it would have waited behind every high. Sorted by exploitability, it went first.
A finding the agent wouldn't guess on. Appknox flagged missing code obfuscation in an iOS app. CVSS v4 scored it 2.1, and AEIS scored it 1, the lowest exploitability. The validation agent also found that the app's main executable was encrypted with Apple's FairPlay DRM (LC_ENCRYPTION_INFO with cryptid=1). Static analysis can't reliably read symbol names in an encrypted binary, so the agent couldn't confirm whether obfuscation was actually missing. It said so, and showed its reasoning. It didn't dismiss the finding as a false positive or call it confirmed. It left it for a human to review.
In another scan, the original results listed two findings under one vulnerability. KnoxIQ kept one and filtered the other as a likely false positive. Both stayed visible under Original Analysis.
Putting AI into security triage raises fair questions. Here's how KnoxIQ keeps it in control:
Your scans, reports and dashboard stay the same. What changes is the work that lands on people after the scan.
|
Who |
Before KnoxIQ |
With KnoxIQ |
|
AppSec lead |
A long findings list per release, sorted by severity |
A validated list sorted by exploitability, with reasoning behind every call |
|
Security engineer |
Hours decompiling and reproducing findings to confirm them |
Steps to reproduce, evidence and an attack scenario for each finding |
|
Developer |
A CWE ID and a generic compliant code sample |
A fix for this app that names the file and the change, plus a prompt for their coding agent |
KnoxIQ is an add-on to the Appknox platform. Once it's enabled for your organisation:
Your scanner already finds the issues. Now KnoxIQ tells you which ones matter and how to fix them.
Already on Appknox? Ask your account team to enable KnoxIQ for your organisation.
New to Appknox? Book a demo to see KnoxIQ triage findings on your own app.
Hackers never rest. Neither should your security!
Stay ahead of emerging threats, vulnerabilities, and best practices in mobile app security—delivered straight to your inbox.
Exclusive insights. Zero fluff. Absolute security.
Join the Appknox Security Insider Newsletter!